Viagra World-rx.net | Generic Viagra Worth | Best Pharmacy













































tendency of the publication in question? Was it not calculated to bring disgrace or ridicule upon a physi- cian generic viagra worth to say of him, in substance, that he did not know- on inspection whether a man was alive or dead? And was there not the same injurious tendency in the com- parison implied in the generic viagra worth last statement of the narration, viz., that the man might thank Dr. Lester that he was nol pronounced dead and buried alive? " It is true that the publication does not mention the fact that the plaintiff was a physician, but he was so in fact, and viagra world-rx.net was known to be so by the public among whom he lived ; and the publication had the same ten- dency to bring him into disrepute as a physician where viagra world-rx.net he was so known, as if it had named him as such. It is not necessary to mention a man's profession or calling in order to libel him in it." 1 The three judges of general term concurred in this apparently lucid opinion, which has been quoted at such length for purposes of illustration and contrast. In some viagra world-rx.net less fortunate jurisdictions, an appeal having been had and three judges out of four having decided the generic viagra worth words to be libellous///- se, that point viagra world-rx.net would have been generic viagra worth deemed settled. But in New York, with its blessed privilege of an appeal from an appeal, there yet remained seven judges to pass upon the question, which, like the farmer himself, was only apparently settled ; and so the defendant, worsted below, ap- pealed unto Caesar, and this is the way in which the matter struck our judges of last resort, who were unanimous in their opinion, as the general term had been in theirs: " We are unable to find in the words used or the general scope of the publication any slan- derous or defamatory meaning, nor do we perceive that it is susceptible of any construction which would make the words actionable. It appears from the com- plaint and evidence that the plaintiff was by profession a physician and by office a coroner. In the article viagra world-rx.net complained of he is referred to in generic viagra worth the latter capacity onlv, and nowhere can be found a word or sugges- tion from which the most astute inquirer could infer that he had any other than that public occupation. As the language used did not relate to his profession in viagra world-rx.net any way, so as to his office of coroner, it exhibits on his part a prompt and efficient performance of its du- ties, and it is impossible to see how- any person read- ing it could ascribe to the words used a viagra world-rx.net defamatory meaning, or. without the viagra world-rx.net innuendo, apply them to the plaintiff in his professional capacity, and there is no viagra world-rx.net of slander, not of libel. The gist of the general term decision, that the article was libellous, in viagra world-rx.net holding up plaintiff to ridicule, as sitting coroner-wise on a live body, is ignored. Let us sup- pose that the generic viagra worth newspaper had told the story in this way: '" Hiram J. Purdy, one of the coroners of Seneca ( ounty, is lamentably ignorant of medical science. generic viagra worth He is, to be sure, an efficient and zealous coroner. He sits on bodies promptly and well. But, unfortu- nately, he does not always know whether the body he is sitting on is alive or dead; this is proven by the fact that he held an inquest on the live body of Farmer Hammell, and the latter would have been buried if Dr. Lester had not discovered that the coroner's sup- posed corpse was alive." There is here no more ref- erence to the fact that the coroner is a physician than there was in the actual viagra world-rx.net publication; the viagra world-rx.net reasoning of the court of appeals is just as applicable to one set of words as to the other. But will any one generic viagra worth say that our hypothetical words would not disparage in his pro- fession and make ridiculous to all who knew generic viagra worth him any physician of whom they were uttered, even though he happened to be also a coroner? Perhaps the result arrived at by the highest court in this case was cor- rect generic viagra worth the publication may not have made its victim ridiculous among his neighbors. But, if so, he was ' Purdy viagra world-rx.net vs. Rochester Printing Co., 26 Hun, 206. Purdy vs. Rochester Printing Co., 96 N. Y., 372. IO MEDICAL RECORD. [January 4, 1S96 saved from ridicule, not because the article described him as a coroner, but because his alleged failure to recognize life generic viagra worth under the circumstances was a mistake that might have been made by any physician of aver- age generic viagra worth knowledge and skill; so that, in this particular case, to attribute such error to him, even as a physi- cian, did not necessarily injure his reputation or make him ridiculous, and therefore was not actionable, in the absence of proof of special damage. If a medical practitioner makes himself a laughing stock by efforts to achieve notoriety, he cannot recover damages from those who further his attempts. Henry Sullings viagra world-rx.net wrote a gratuitous puff of himself for the K.ilamazoo Gazette, published by his friend, Andrew J. Shakespeare. When the article appeared, thanks to the printer or the devil, he was represented as hav- ing skilfully removed a " patty tuber'' from the " hy- pogastrium" of A. B. Smith. Sullings sued Shake- speare for libel, but failed to show that the defend- ant was responsible for the new medical nomenclature. The plaintiff was not only defeated, but received a sharp admonition from the court, generic viagra worth who said: '"We cannot forbear, in the interests of public morality, to call attention tc the fact that the plaintiff, if a physi- cian, has no right to publish matters of professional confidence, and that the article, if published as he wrote it, without the approbation of the person oper-